by Olena Perepelynska
Olena Perepelynska is a partner, head of International Arbitration at INTEGRITES
by Andrey Bychkov, Roman Protsyshyn
To avoid the risk of actual recovery of the claim being ultimately thwarted, various interim measures designed to preserve the status quo come into play, allowing an aggrieved party to secure enforcement of a judgment or arbitral award if made in its favour. This instrument also ensures that the successful party’s efforts and costs of running litigation or arbitration are not wasted. Thus, the importance of interim measures cannot be overstated.
Andrey Bychkov is a counsel, attorney at law at Ilyashev & Partners
Roman Protsyshyn is an attorney at law at Ilyashev & Partners
by Ivan Vashchynets
Ivan Vashchynets is a partner at ARBITRADE
Sayenko Kharenko advised on second USD 50 million Eurobond tap issue by Trans-Oil Group
CMS advised Vodafone Ukraine
Sayenko Kharenko provided legal support for PGNiG
INTEGRITES assisted Sturgeon Capital
Apple deprived of monopoly on payments for applications
Сourt in Netherlands recognized Uber taxi drivers as employees
Shell to pay Nigeria USD 111 million for oil spill in 1970s
Privatbank Eurobond bail-in: ruling by Bank of England now conclusive
WhatsApp fined EUR 225 million in Ireland for violating privacy rules
Thousands of companies to be obliged to pay insurance on environmental damage
Draft registered in Parliament on abolition of Economic Code of Ukraine
Parliament adopted law in first reading guaranteeing rights to real estate under construction
Zelensky signed laws on development of ecologically friendly transport
Parliament approved simultaneous transfer of right to land and real estate
Parliament legalized virtual currencies in Ukraine
Industrial parks re-launch: Parliament adopted law
AmCham Ukraine shortlisted for European Creative Network Award 2021
The Road to Recovery: European M&A Outlook 2022
PayPal acquires Paidy for USD 2.7 billion
Swiss company “subsidiary” invests USD 40 million in Chornomorsk Port
Monobank acquired service to combine restaurant payments and reviews
World Bank to stop publishing Doing Business rating
Ukrainian startup GitLab set to go public, market valuation exceeds USD 6 billion
Google invests EUR 1 billion in cloud services and renewable energy in Germany
by Oleksandr Tereshchenko
The dispute concerned wood export bans imposed by Ukraine in 2005 and 2015. The EU requested to declare that 2005 and 2015 wood export bans were inconsistent with Article 35 of the Agreement and that Ukraine is required to take measures to comply with those obligations. Ukraine requested to reject the EU’s claim as inadmissible for lack of jurisdiction of the Panel and reject the EU’s claims on their merits.
Oleksandr Tereshchenko is an attorney-at-law at Aequo
by Anzhela Makhinova, Oleksandra Sandul
Anzhela Makhinova is a partner, head of international trade practice at Sayenko Kharenko
Oleksandra Sandul is a junior associate, international trade practice at Sayenko Kharenko
Subscribe to The Ukrainian Journal of Business Law right now and enjoy the most relevant issues on doing business in Ukraine on your device or in print.
All this for just USD 9.99 a month.
Reset password
Subscribe/Register